Review of book by M. Lee Goff that uses case studies to explain the process by which different species of bugs break down decomposing bodies.
A Fly for the Prosecution – How Insect Evidence Helps Solve CrimesRead More
// by Sarah Olson
Review of book by M. Lee Goff that uses case studies to explain the process by which different species of bugs break down decomposing bodies.
A Fly for the Prosecution – How Insect Evidence Helps Solve CrimesRead More
// by Sarah Olson
Provides general information about how law enforcement officers and medical professionals evaluate whether an injury, including fractures and burns, was intentional or accidental. It was published in 2000 in the American Family Physician.
// by Sarah Olson
1999 US DOJ guide developed by the Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence. Law enforcement should be aware of these best practices.
// by Sarah Olson
February 1999 report by the National Institute of Justice that addresses the challenges facing the forensic science profession. Contains analysis and recommendations that complement the 2009 National Academy of Sciences report.
// by Sarah Olson
// by Sarah Olson
by Gary Wills, Mark Small Steven Penrod, Roy Malpass, Solomon Fulero, C.A.E. Brimacombe, Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 22, No. 6, 1998.
Eyewitness Identification Procedures: Recommendations for Lineups and PhotospreadsRead More
// by Sarah Olson
// by Sarah Olson
// by Alec Rees
A 1993 memorandum by John Rubin, Professor of Public Law and Government at UNC School of Government on the voluntary intoxication defense, its history, elements of the defense, applicability to different offenses, and evidentiary issues.
// by Alec Rees
John Rubin, UNC School of Government (Sept. 1992). ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE MEMORANDUM No. 92/01. Discusses the nature of the diminished capacity defense as it is recognized in North Carolina, how the defense applies to various offenses, evidentiary problems that can arise when the defense is raised, the defendant’s burden of presenting evidence, the prosecution’s burden …
// by Sarah Olson
A law review article on State v. Temple, 302 N.C. 1 (1981) where the NC Supreme Court held that testimony regarding bite marks identification analysis is admissible as long as the trial court can verify the scientific methods used were accurate and reliable. Includes a summary of the case, background, and an analysis of the …
// by Sarah Olson
// by Sarah Olson
// by Sarah Olson
// by Sarah Olson
