• About
  • Blog
  • Forensic Disciplines
    • Foundations of Forensics
    • Arson
    • Bite Mark
    • Blood & Bodily Fluids
    • Child Abuse Allegations
    • Crime Scene Investigation
    • Death by Distribution
    • Death Investigation
    • Detection Dogs
    • Digital Evidence
    • DNA
    • Drug Analysis
    • Drug Recognition Experts
    • Eyewitness ID
    • Fingerprints
    • Firearms
    • Forensic/Sexual Assault Exams
    • Measurement Uncertainty
    • Mental Health
    • Toxicology
    • Trace Evidence
  • Resources
    • Forensic Consultations
    • Books
    • Cases
    • Featured Articles
    • Legislation
    • Motions and Briefs
      • Discovery Motions
      • Funding for Experts
      • Motions for Appropriate Relief
      • Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony
      • Motions for Independent Testing
      • Motions to Preserve Evidence
      • Motions to Suppress
      • Analyst Certification Motions
    • Reports & Publications
    • Trainings
    • Websites
    • Forensic Terminology
    • Online Research Tools
  • Crime Labs
    • General Information
    • NC State Crime Lab Procedures
    • Charlotte Mecklenburg Crime Lab
    • CCBI Lab Procedures
    • NC OCME Toxicology Lab
    • Pitt Co. Sheriff’s Forensic Services
    • Sec. of State Digital Forensic Lab
    • Wilmington Police Dept Crime Lab
    • Private and Out-of-State Labs
  • News Articles
  • Experts
    • Browse All Experts
    • Working with Experts
    • Expert Services Project
    • Add or Update Expert Records
    • Find a Private Investigator
  • Subscribe
  • Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Forensic Resources

North Carolina Office of Indigent Defense Services

Header Right

MENUMENU
  • About
  • Blog
  • Forensic Disciplines
        • Foundations of Forensics
        • Arson
        • Bite Mark
        • Blood & Bodily Fluids
        • Child Abuse Allegations
        • Crime Scene Investigation
        • Death by Distribution
        • Death Investigation
        • Detection Dogs
        • Digital Evidence
        • DNA
        • Drug Analysis
        • Drug Recognition Experts
        • Eyewitness ID
        • Fingerprints
        • Firearms
        • Forensic/Sexual Assault Exams
        • Measurement Uncertainty
        • Mental Health
        • Toxicology
        • Trace Evidence
  • Resources
        • Forensic Consultations
        • Books
        • Cases
        • Featured Articles
        • Legislation
        • Reports & Publications
        • Trainings
        • Websites
        • Forensic Terminology
        • Online Research Tools
        • Motions and Briefs
          • Discovery Motions
          • Funding for Experts
          • Motions for Appropriate Relief
          • Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony
          • Motions for Independent Testing
          • Motions to Preserve Evidence
          • Motions to Suppress
          • Analyst Certification Motions
  • Crime Labs
    • General Information
    • NC State Crime Lab Procedures
    • Charlotte Mecklenburg Crime Lab
    • CCBI Lab Procedures
    • NC OCME Toxicology Lab
    • Pitt Co. Sheriff’s Forensic Services
    • Sec. of State Digital Forensic Lab
    • Wilmington Police Dept Crime Lab
    • Private and Out-of-State Labs
  • News Articles
  • Experts
    • Browse All Experts
    • Working with Experts
    • Expert Services Project
    • Add or Update Expert Records
    • Find a Private Investigator
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Archives for Resources

Resources

PCAST Report

September 1, 2016 //  by Sarah Olson

The 2016 President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Report found that latent fingerprint analysis is a foundationally valid subjective methodology, but with a false positive rate that is substantial and is likely to be higher than expected by many jurors based on longstanding claims about the infallibility of fingerprint analysis. Conclusions of a …

PCAST ReportRead More

Resource Category: Reports and PublicationsForensic Discipline: Fingerprints

PCAST Report

September 1, 2016 //  by Sarah Olson

The 2016 President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Report concluded that “bitemark analysis does not meet scientific standards for foundational validity, and is far from meeting such standards. To the contrary, available scientific evidence strongly suggests that examiners cannot consistently agree on whether an injury is a human bitemark and cannot identify the …

PCAST ReportRead More

Resource Category: Reports and PublicationsForensic Discipline: Bite Mark

Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods

September 1, 2016 //  by Sarah Olson

The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology issued a report (known as the PCAST report) in September 2016. This report assesses the scientific validity and reliability of some important forms of forensic evidence and of testimony. In Jan. 2017, PCAST published an addendum to their report which is available here.

Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison MethodsRead More

Resource Category: Reports and PublicationsForensic Discipline: Foundations of Forensics

Urine Drug Screening: Minimizing False-Positives and False-Negatives to Optimize Patient Care

August 18, 2016 //  by Sarah Olson

Article from US Pharmacist that addresses potential false-positives and false-negatives in urine screens.

Urine Drug Screening: Minimizing False-Positives and False-Negatives to Optimize Patient CareRead More

Resource Category: Featured ArticlesForensic Discipline: Toxicology

State v. Daughtridge, 248 N.C. App. 707 (2016)

August 16, 2016 //  by Sarah Olson

Trial court erred in allowing a forensic pathologist’s opinion that the decedent’s death was a homicide as opposed to a suicide that was based on his interpretation of non-medical information conveyed to him by law enforcement officers. The State failed to adequately explain how the expert was in a better position than the jurors to …

State v. Daughtridge, 248 N.C. App. 707 (2016)Read More

Resource Category: CasesForensic Discipline: Death Investigation

NIST 3D Ballistics Research Database

July 7, 2016 //  by Sarah Olson

Information about a new research database and techniques used in firearm-toolmark comparisons.

NIST 3D Ballistics Research DatabaseRead More

Resource Category: WebsitesForensic Discipline: Firearms

State v. McGrady, 368 N.C. 880 (2016)

June 10, 2016 //  by Sarah Olson

Affirming the decision below, the NCSC held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by ruling that the defendant’s proffered use of force expert testimony did not meet the standard for admissibility under Rule 702(a). The court determined that the 2011 amendment to NC Rule 702(a) adopts the federal standard for the admission …

State v. McGrady, 368 N.C. 880 (2016)Read More

Resource Category: CasesForensic Discipline: Experts

National Protocol for Sexual Abuse Medical Forensic Examinations – Pediatric

April 1, 2016 //  by Sarah Olson

April 2016 U.S. Department of Justice protocol for medical forensic examinations of children. See requirements for documentation and photography. For the interview portion of the investigation, attorneys should be aware of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Investigative Interview Protocol.

National Protocol for Sexual Abuse Medical Forensic Examinations – PediatricRead More

Resource Category: Reports and PublicationsForensic Discipline: Forensic/Sexual Assault Exams

PCAST Report

January 1, 2016 //  by Sarah Olson

The 2016 PCAST Report found that “firearms analysis currently falls short of the criteria for foundational validity, because there is only a single appropriately designed study to measure validity and estimate reliability. The scientific criteria for foundational validity require more than one such study, to demonstrate reproducibility. Whether firearms analysis should be deemed admissible based on …

PCAST ReportRead More

Resource Category: Reports and PublicationsForensic Discipline: Firearms

Traumatic shaking: The role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking

January 1, 2016 //  by Sarah Olson

Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment 2016 review of the available scientific evidence finding: There is limited scientific evidence that the triad and therefore its components can be associated with traumatic shaking (low quality evidence). There is insufficient scientific evidence on which to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the triad in identifying traumatic shaking (very …

Traumatic shaking: The role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shakingRead More

Resource Category: Reports and PublicationsForensic Discipline: Child Abuse Allegations

Weak DNA evidence could undermine justice, experts say

July 12, 2015 //  by Sarah Olson

Chicago Tribune article uses a case example to demonstrate the dangers of using DNA evidence that has very little probative value. New technology is allowing DNA analysis to be performed on very small amounts of DNA which may generate incomplete genetic profiles that may or may not be meaningful in a case.

Weak DNA evidence could undermine justice, experts sayRead More

Resource Category: Reports and PublicationsForensic Discipline: DNA

What’s In a (Trade) Name?

July 7, 2015 //  by Chris Liu-Beers

Today, the court of appeals reversed a defendant’s drug convictions because the indictments identified the controlled substances in question using terms that are widely used to describe the drugs, but that are neither the chemical names listed in the controlled substance schedules nor – according to the court – “trade names” for the drugs. Because …

What’s In a (Trade) Name?Read More

Resource Category: CasesForensic Discipline: Drug Analysis

An experimental investigation of the indirect transfer and deposition of gunshot residue: Further studies carried out with SEM–EDX analysis

February 1, 2015 //  by Sarah Olson

In this research study, as many as 22 particles were found to have undergone tertiary transfer via a series of handshakes following a firearm discharge. Significant numbers of particles were also recovered from bystanders, with as many as 36 being detected on a sample taken from an individual who was in the proximity of a …

An experimental investigation of the indirect transfer and deposition of gunshot residue: Further studies carried out with SEM–EDX analysisRead More

Resource Category: Featured ArticlesForensic Discipline: Trace Evidence

Forensic DNA Mixups

February 1, 2015 //  by Sarah Olson

Feb. 2015 Ted Talk video by Dr. Greg Hampikian covers forensic DNA errors including statistical and interpretation errors and contamination issues.

Forensic DNA MixupsRead More

Resource Category: TrainingsForensic Discipline: DNA

The path forward on bite mark matching – and the rearview mirror

February 1, 2015 //  by Sarah Olson

4-part Washington Post series on the flawed “science” of bite mark analysis

The path forward on bite mark matching – and the rearview mirrorRead More

Resource Category: Reports and PublicationsForensic Discipline: Bite Mark

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 40
  • Page 41
  • Page 42
  • Page 43
  • Page 44
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 54
  • Go to Next Page »

Site Footer

The Forensic Resource Counsel provides assistance to North Carolina attorneys litigating scientific evidence issues.
Information provided on this website is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.
Copyright © 2026 · Office of Indigent Defense Services · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design

Copyright © 2026 Forensic Resources · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme