Savannah spends $489K on ShotSpotter but doesn’t keep data on effectivenessRead More
Firearms
‘We have to try something’: Durham police chief says ShotSpotter could address violent crime
The Field of Firearms Forensics Is Flawed
Toolmark-Comparison Testimony: A Report to the Texas Forensic Science Commission
To assist the Texas Forensic Science Commission in a pending review of traditional toolmark-comparison testimony, the Yale Law School Forensic Science Standards Practicum submitted this report on the range of approaches that courts, legal commentators, and scientists have proposed for presenting toolmark-comparison evidence in trial settings. The report addresses four major topics: (1) the case …
Toolmark-Comparison Testimony: A Report to the Texas Forensic Science CommissionRead More
Kathleen Clardy
State v. Gallion
COA found no plain error in allowing firearm identification testimony. Former NCSCL analyst Wilson testified in detail about her methodology, but provided little information about application of the method to the case at hand.
How AI-powered tech landed man in jail with scant evidence
Why a High-Ranking FBI Attorney Is Pushing ‘Unbelievable’ Junk Science on Guns
DC public defenders seek wider review into fingerprints, firearms evidence
Whiskey in the Courtroom 8: Evolving Trends in Forensic Science – Firearms Evidence
In person and live webcast, Sponsored by Indigent Defense Services, the Duke Law Center for Criminal Justice and Professional Responsibility, and the Wilson Center for Science and Justice
Whiskey in the Courtroom 8: Evolving Trends in Forensic Science – Firearms EvidenceRead More
Whiskey in the Courtroom 8: Evolving Trends in Forensic Science – Firearms Evidence
Indigent Defense Services, the Duke Law Center for Criminal Justice and Professional Responsibility, and the Wilson Center for Science and Justice are pleased to announce the eighth annual CLE, “Whiskey in the Courtroom: Evolving Trends in Forensic Science.” Whiskey 8 will take place on March 4, 2022 at Duke Law School. We plan to be in-person …
Whiskey in the Courtroom 8: Evolving Trends in Forensic Science – Firearms EvidenceRead More
Statement of the TX Forensic Science Commission Regarding “Alternate Firearms Opinion Terminology”
Dec. 2021 statement Addressing a USDOJ document that instructs firearms examiners to avoid using terminology such as the weapon “could have fired” the bullets or cartridge cases, “consistent with” or “could not be excluded” as having fired the bullets or cartridge cases.
The FBI’s Misinformation Campaign on Firearms-toolmark Testimony
State v. Thomas, 2021 NCCOA-402
COA held that trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the testimonyof the State’s GSR expert because he followed the State Crime Lab’s procedures asrequired to meet Rule 702(a)’s reliability requirement where defendant made statement upon GSR collection that he had been asleep during the 5+ hour period between shooting and collection.