• About
  • Blog
  • Forensic Disciplines
    • Foundations of Forensics
    • Arson
    • Bite Mark
    • Blood & Bodily Fluids
    • Child Abuse Allegations
    • Crime Scene Investigation
    • Death Investigation
    • Detection Dogs
    • Digital Evidence
    • DNA
    • Drug Analysis
    • Drug Recognition Experts
    • Eyewitness ID
    • Fingerprints
    • Firearms
    • Forensic/Sexual Assault Exams
    • Measurement Uncertainty
    • Mental Health
    • Toxicology
    • Trace Evidence
  • Resources
    • Forensic Consultations
    • Books
    • Cases
    • Featured Articles
    • Legislation
    • Motions and Briefs
      • Discovery Motions
      • Funding for Experts
      • Motions for Appropriate Relief
      • Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony
      • Motions for Independent Testing
      • Motions to Preserve Evidence
      • Motions to Suppress
      • Analyst Certification Motions
    • Reports & Publications
    • Trainings
    • Websites
    • Forensic Terminology
    • Online Research Tools
  • Crime Labs
    • General Information
    • NC State Crime Lab Procedures
    • Charlotte Mecklenburg Crime Lab
    • CCBI Lab Procedures
    • NC OCME Toxicology Lab
    • Pitt Co. Sheriff’s Forensic Services
    • Sec. of State Digital Forensic Lab
    • Wilmington Police Dept Crime Lab
    • Private and Out-of-State Labs
  • News Articles
  • Experts
    • Browse All Experts
    • Working with Experts
    • Expert Services Project
    • Add or Update Expert Records
    • Find a Private Investigator
  • Subscribe
  • Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Forensic Resources

North Carolina Office of Indigent Defense Services

Header Right

MENUMENU
  • About
  • Blog
  • Forensic Disciplines
        • Foundations of Forensics
        • Arson
        • Bite Mark
        • Blood & Bodily Fluids
        • Child Abuse Allegations
        • Crime Scene Investigation
        • Death Investigation
        • Detection Dogs
        • Digital Evidence
        • DNA
        • Drug Analysis
        • Drug Recognition Experts
        • Eyewitness ID
        • Fingerprints
        • Firearms
        • Forensic/Sexual Assault Exams
        • Measurement Uncertainty
        • Mental Health
        • Toxicology
        • Trace Evidence
  • Resources
        • Forensic Consultations
        • Books
        • Cases
        • Featured Articles
        • Legislation
        • Reports & Publications
        • Trainings
        • Websites
        • Forensic Terminology
        • Online Research Tools
        • Motions and Briefs
          • Discovery Motions
          • Funding for Experts
          • Motions for Appropriate Relief
          • Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony
          • Motions for Independent Testing
          • Motions to Preserve Evidence
          • Motions to Suppress
          • Analyst Certification Motions
  • Crime Labs
    • General Information
    • NC State Crime Lab Procedures
    • Charlotte Mecklenburg Crime Lab
    • CCBI Lab Procedures
    • NC OCME Toxicology Lab
    • Pitt Co. Sheriff’s Forensic Services
    • Sec. of State Digital Forensic Lab
    • Wilmington Police Dept Crime Lab
    • Private and Out-of-State Labs
  • News Articles
  • Experts
    • Browse All Experts
    • Working with Experts
    • Expert Services Project
    • Add or Update Expert Records
    • Find a Private Investigator
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Experts / Forensic mental health evaluations during the COVID-19 pandemic

Forensic mental health evaluations during the COVID-19 pandemic

June 25, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson//  Leave a Comment

Several attorneys have asked about having in-custody clients evaluated for competency or purposes during the COVID-19 pandemic. I’ve talked with experts about their availability and many are available, if appropriate measures to ensure safety are in place during the mental health evaluation.

There isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach to how to conduct these necessary evaluations, but there are several factors that attorneys should consider when arranging an evaluation of an in-custody client by an independent expert.

Staying informed
Attorneys and experts should stay informed about how COVID-19 is transmitted, signs and symptoms of COVID-19, COVID-19 vulnerability, and ways to mitigate risks and concerns for individuals, especially those in congregate living facilities. Trusted sources of information such as the CDC, the WHO, and NC DHHS provide information about precautions that should be taken. Experts should consider being confirmed COVID-19 negative prior to scheduling in-person meetings with vulnerable individuals.

Timing
The attorney should decide whether it is necessary to conduct the evaluation immediately or if the evaluation can be delayed. If the client is displaying symptoms that need immediate attention or are short-term and potentially indicative of mental state at the time of the offense, it may not be possible to delay.

If the evaluation is going to be delayed, the attorneys should ask about the expert’s caseload to ensure they will have availability to conduct the evaluation once trials resume and conditions improve. Some experts have accepted new cases during the pandemic and are performing tasks such as record review until it is safe to conduct in-person evaluations. When trials resume, these experts may have a backlog of evaluations to conduct that were on hold during the pandemic.

Infection rates
The attorney should collect information for the expert about the current infection rate within the facility. Information about the number of tests performed in the state’s correctional facilities and the results are available here. However, this information does not indicate the number of inmates currently infected with COVID-19 in a facility.

Visitation conditions
The attorney should collect information about what visitation conditions are available where the client is being detained. Here are some possible conditions that a detention facility may offer:

  • Video visitation – The attorney should find out if the facility is equipped to offer a secure, confidential, and not-recorded video conference that an expert can use to conduct an evaluation remotely, where appropriate.
  • In-person non-contact visitation – The attorney should find out the procedure for cleaning the visitation room and equipment between visits, whether documents can be shared in a non-contact visit, and whether lighting and audio is adequate for the expert to conduct an evaluation during a non-contact visit.
  • Contact visitation – The attorney should find out whether the facility provides/requires personal protective equipment for the visitor and the inmate, and whether the visitor can bring their own PPE, such as mask, gloves, hand sanitizer, sanitizing wipes or other equipment to disinfect equipment like written materials, blocks, or other necessary items.
  • Other – The attorney should consider whether it possible to transport the client to a secure location where social distancing can be observed during evaluation, such as a conference room in the courthouse. If the client is out of custody, the attorney should consider whether they can provide appropriate testing conditions in their office.

Before the visit
Ensure that proper conditions are in place for the safety of the expert and the client and so that the expert is not put in the position of having to refuse the visit upon the discovery of unexpected conditions.

Inform the expert of any safety precautions that the detention facility has in place, such as taking of temperature, requirement of PPE, or other conditions. Some facilities will exclude visitors who have a temperature above 99.5 F. Experts and attorneys should check their temperatures before traveling to a facility and consider factors other than fever that can cause a slight fluctuations in body temperature, such as stress, time of day, exposure to heat/cold, menstrual cycle, exercise, eating, and many other factors. Discuss the visitation conditions with the expert to ensure that they meet the needs of the expert for conducting the evaluation. Discuss with the expert the current infection rate at the facility if the expert needs that information. Finally, discuss with the expert a plan for what to do if proper conditions are not available at the time of the visit.

Some additional general recommendations for experts and attorneys preparing for an evaluation to be conducted in a detention facility are available here.

Category: Experts, Practice TipsForensic Discipline: Experts, Mental Health

Previous Post: « “Too Pandora’s Boxy for Silicon Valley” – John Oliver Discusses the Use of Facial Recognition Technology by Law Enforcement
Next Post: New Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports documents published by US DOJ »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Site Footer

The Forensic Resource Counsel provides assistance to North Carolina attorneys litigating scientific evidence issues.
Information provided on this website is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.
Copyright © 2023 · Office of Indigent Defense Services · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design

Copyright © 2023 Forensic Resources · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme