Published by NIJ in 2024
Death Investigation: A Guide for the Scene InvestigatorRead More
// by Sarah Olson
Published by NIJ in 2024
Death Investigation: A Guide for the Scene InvestigatorRead More
// by Sarah Olson
June 2024 Report of Susan Brooks
// by Sarah Olson
Proceedings of a 2024 National Academies of Sciences Workshop – In Brief
// by Sarah Olson
Report published by NIST in 2024
// by Sarah Olson
This report by the Penn Carey Law Quattrone Center provides the first-ever comprehensive analysis of presumptive drug field test usage across law enforcement agencies in the United States. Inexpensive and fast, these tests have become a tool of choice for law enforcement agencies. Unfortunately, they are notoriously imprecise and are known to produce “false positives,” …
Guilty Until Proven Innocent: Field Drug Tests and Wrongful ConvictionsRead More
// by Sarah Olson
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has reviewed the scientific foundations of bitemark analysis, a forensic technique in which marks on the skin of a biting victim are compared with the teeth of a suspected biter and found that the field is not supported by sufficient data. NIST has published its findings in …
Bitemark Analysis: A NIST Scientific Foundation ReviewRead More
// by Sarah Olson
// by Sarah Olson
NACDL Training and Resource Counsel Clare Garvie has authored a new report titled A Forensic Without the Science: Facial Recognition in U.S. Criminal Investigations. Designed as a resource for defense attorneys, advocates, and the public, it outlines how police face recognition searches are prone to error from under-performing algorithms, the lack of training and cognitive …
A Forensic Without the Science: Face Recognition in U.S. Criminal InvestigationsRead More
// by Sarah Olson
Convicted offender DNA sample collection laws vary in each state in terms of what type of offense obligates an offender to provide a sample, whether a conviction should be the trigger for sample collection, and which agency is responsible for collecting the sample. Because of this interstate variability, the effectiveness of DNA sample collection laws …
A Review of Legislation Associated with Lawfully-Owed DNA SamplesRead More
// by Sarah Olson
Guidance document published in Aug. 2022.
Considerations for Photographic Documentation in Sexual Assault CasesRead More
// by Sarah Olson
5-page primer from NACDL’s Fourth Amendment Center that prepares attorneys to litigate a motion to suppress a geofence warrant.
// by Sarah Olson
To assist the Texas Forensic Science Commission in a pending review of traditional toolmark-comparison testimony, the Yale Law School Forensic Science Standards Practicum submitted this report on the range of approaches that courts, legal commentators, and scientists have proposed for presenting toolmark-comparison evidence in trial settings. The report addresses four major topics: (1) the case …
Toolmark-Comparison Testimony: A Report to the Texas Forensic Science CommissionRead More
// by Sarah Olson
Dec. 2021 statement Addressing a USDOJ document that instructs firearms examiners to avoid using terminology such as the weapon “could have fired” the bullets or cartridge cases, “consistent with” or “could not be excluded” as having fired the bullets or cartridge cases.
// by Kate Shurtleff
// by Kate Shurtleff
NC State Crime Lab
Procedure for Analysis Interpretation of STR DNA ProfilesRead More