• About
  • Blog
  • Forensic Disciplines
    • Foundations of Forensics
    • Arson
    • Bite Mark
    • Blood & Bodily Fluids
    • Child Abuse Allegations
    • Crime Scene Investigation
    • Death Investigation
    • Detection Dogs
    • Digital Evidence
    • DNA
    • Drug Analysis
    • Drug Recognition Experts
    • Eyewitness ID
    • Fingerprints
    • Firearms
    • Forensic/Sexual Assault Exams
    • Measurement Uncertainty
    • Mental Health
    • Toxicology
    • Trace Evidence
  • Resources
    • Forensic Consultations
    • Books
    • Cases
    • Featured Articles
    • Legislation
    • Motions and Briefs
      • Discovery Motions
      • Funding for Experts
      • Motions for Appropriate Relief
      • Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony
      • Motions for Independent Testing
      • Motions to Preserve Evidence
      • Motions to Suppress
      • Analyst Certification Motions
    • Reports & Publications
    • Trainings
    • Websites
    • Forensic Terminology
    • Online Research Tools
  • Crime Labs
    • General Information
    • NC State Crime Lab Procedures
    • Charlotte Mecklenburg Crime Lab
    • CCBI Lab Procedures
    • NC OCME Toxicology Lab
    • Pitt Co. Sheriff’s Forensic Services
    • Sec. of State Digital Forensic Lab
    • Wilmington Police Dept Crime Lab
    • Private and Out-of-State Labs
  • News Articles
  • Experts
    • Browse All Experts
    • Working with Experts
    • Expert Services Project
    • Add or Update Expert Records
  • Subscribe
  • Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Forensic Resources

North Carolina Office of Indigent Defense Services

Header Right

MENUMENU
  • About
  • Blog
  • Forensic Disciplines
        • Foundations of Forensics
        • Arson
        • Bite Mark
        • Blood & Bodily Fluids
        • Child Abuse Allegations
        • Crime Scene Investigation
        • Death Investigation
        • Detection Dogs
        • Digital Evidence
        • DNA
        • Drug Analysis
        • Drug Recognition Experts
        • Eyewitness ID
        • Fingerprints
        • Firearms
        • Forensic/Sexual Assault Exams
        • Measurement Uncertainty
        • Mental Health
        • Toxicology
        • Trace Evidence
  • Resources
        • Forensic Consultations
        • Books
        • Cases
        • Featured Articles
        • Legislation
        • Reports & Publications
        • Trainings
        • Websites
        • Forensic Terminology
        • Online Research Tools
        • Motions and Briefs
          • Discovery Motions
          • Funding for Experts
          • Motions for Appropriate Relief
          • Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony
          • Motions for Independent Testing
          • Motions to Preserve Evidence
          • Motions to Suppress
          • Analyst Certification Motions
  • Crime Labs
    • General Information
    • NC State Crime Lab Procedures
    • Charlotte Mecklenburg Crime Lab
    • CCBI Lab Procedures
    • NC OCME Toxicology Lab
    • Pitt Co. Sheriff’s Forensic Services
    • Sec. of State Digital Forensic Lab
    • Wilmington Police Dept Crime Lab
    • Private and Out-of-State Labs
  • News Articles
  • Experts
    • Browse All Experts
    • Working with Experts
    • Expert Services Project
    • Add or Update Expert Records
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Archives for Motions and Briefs / Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony

Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony

Defendant-Appellant’s Brief: State v. Lance

June 1, 2020 //  by Alec Rees

Defendant-Appellant’s Brief: State v. LanceRead More

Resource Category: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony, Motions and BriefsForensic Discipline: Arson

Hemp 702 Motion Draft

June 18, 2019 //  by Matt Ruby

A draft 702 motion to exclude expert testimony from an arresting officer identifying a substance as marijuana.

Hemp 702 Motion DraftRead More

Resource Category: Motion to Exclude Expert TestimonyForensic Discipline: Drug Analysis

Motion to Exclude Firearm Identification Testimony of Agents Tanner and Ware

April 24, 2019 //  by Sarah Olson

Trial court denied the motion, but initially prohibited the State from offering testimony “that the bullets in question were fired from the same weapon” because of potential for misleading the jury. However, the testimony was allowed after the trial court found the defense opened the door to the testimony during opening statements.

Motion to Exclude Firearm Identification Testimony of Agents Tanner and WareRead More

Resource Category: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony, Motions and BriefsForensic Discipline: Firearms

Motion to Exclude Firearm Identification Testimony, Memorandum of Law, State’s Brief in Response to Defendant’s Motion, and Order

April 24, 2019 //  by Sarah Olson

2011 motion in limine by Richard Ramsey. Example of how to use the National Academy of Sciences report and other professional standards in a motion to exclude or suppress forensic evidence. Transcript of motion’s hearing available upon request.

Motion to Exclude Firearm Identification Testimony, Memorandum of Law, State’s Brief in Response to Defendant’s Motion, and OrderRead More

Resource Category: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony, Motions and BriefsForensic Discipline: Firearms

Motion to Prohibit State’s Expert from Rendering Opinion on Gun Shot Residue Testing

April 24, 2019 //  by Sarah Olson

Motion filed by David Botchin and Mark Rabil.

Motion to Prohibit State’s Expert from Rendering Opinion on Gun Shot Residue TestingRead More

Resource Category: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony, Motions and BriefsForensic Discipline: Firearms

Motion to Exclude Testimony Regarding Field Sobriety Tests

April 24, 2019 //  by Sarah Olson

Motion to exclude expert testimony based on failure to satisfy requirements of the new Rule 702 of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence.

Motion to Exclude Testimony Regarding Field Sobriety TestsRead More

Resource Category: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony, Motions and BriefsForensic Discipline: Toxicology

Order Excluding Paul Glover’s Testimony

April 24, 2019 //  by Sarah Olson

Order granted in attorney James Davis’s case in 2013 under the new Rule of Evidence 702.

Order Excluding Paul Glover’s TestimonyRead More

Resource Category: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony, Motions and BriefsForensic Discipline: Toxicology

Cook County Motion to Exclude Fingerprint Identification

April 24, 2019 //  by Sarah Olson

2018 Motion to Exclude testimony about fingerprint “identification” because it is scientifically indefensible, will overstate the probative value of fingerprint evidence and unduly prejudice the Defense, and mislead the trier of fact.

Cook County Motion to Exclude Fingerprint IdentificationRead More

Resource Category: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony, Motions and BriefsForensic Discipline: Fingerprints

State v. Rudolph

April 24, 2019 //  by Sarah Olson

Northern District of Alabama (Daubert jurisdiction) Motion to Exclude Testimony of Forensic Fingerprint Examiner – includes a comprehensive history of what scientific validation has and has not been completed for this field. Critiques the lack of uniform standards. Critiques analysis of small or distorted latent prints. Affidavit of Simon Cole – This expert in the field of …

State v. RudolphRead More

Resource Category: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony, Motions and BriefsForensic Discipline: Fingerprints

State v. Zajac

April 24, 2019 //  by Sarah Olson

District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division Zajac Order – granted in part and denied in part the Defendant’s motion to exclude fingerprint evidence. Important example of how the language used by the fingerprint examiner can be limited. Memo in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Fingerprint Evidence

State v. ZajacRead More

Resource Category: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony, Motions and BriefsForensic Discipline: Fingerprints

Innocence Project’s amicus brief

April 16, 2019 //  by Sarah Olson

For a copy of the Innocence Project’s amicus brief in a Frye challenge to the admissibility of bite mark evidence, email Sarah Rackley Olson.

Innocence Project’s amicus briefRead More

Resource Category: Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony, Motions and BriefsForensic Discipline: Bite Mark

Site Footer

The Forensic Resource Counsel provides assistance to North Carolina attorneys litigating scientific evidence issues.
Information provided on this website is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.
Copyright © 2023 · Office of Indigent Defense Services · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design

Copyright © 2023 Forensic Resources · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme