North Carolina Office of Indigent Defense Services
// by danielleef
Forensic scientists are tasked with the job of explaining often complex scientific data to judges, jurors, and attorneys who may have little understanding of the science underlying the forensic analysis in a case. Revelations in recent years that hair analysts provided testimony that had no scientific validity has highlighted the importance of using correct language to …
Language Matters: USDOJ’s Reporting Language and Testimony GuidelinesRead More
// by Sarah Olson
Take a tour inside a state-operated crime lab with Professor Carol Henderson, Director of Stetson’s National Clearinghouse for Science, Technology, and the Law (NCSTL); Ann Talbot, the director of the Metro Nashville, Police Department Crime Laboratory; and Christine Funk, a criminal defense attorney with over 20 years of practice experience. Crime Laboratory Essentials is a webinar …
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Matt Ruby
WPDCL Quality System Manual
// by Matt Ruby
WPDCL Quality Management System Procedure for Reporting Results
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Sarah Olson
This motion is designed to: Preserve evidence for future testing by defense experts Remediate situations in which State testing will consume the entire sample Protect the client’s legal interests regarding the destruction of evidence An order to preserve evidence should be sought at the outset of a case. Some preservation orders prohibit all testing or …
Sample Motion for Preservation of Forensic EvidenceRead More
// by burkedj2
The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) announced that it will begin conducting an analysis of the scientific bases for ten forensic disciplines. Through funding from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, AAAS plans to review the current scientific studies regarding the procedures and testimony of forensic experts. This analysis is a direct …
AAAS Responds to the NAS’s call for Research Backing Forensic ScienceRead More
// by Matt Ruby
WPDCL Quality Management System Procedure Reagent Check
// by Sarah Olson
A recent meeting with a supposed forensic psychology expert reminded me of the importance of attorneys always vetting their own experts. This individual was referred to me by another trusted expert. After our initial meeting, I started looking in to his credentials and quickly learned that he did not have a Ph.D. and was not licensed …
// by Sarah Olson
The National Commission on Forensic Science has released six documents for public review and comment. The Commission’s recommendations, if adopted, will be recommendations to the Attorney General of the United States. However, they may become recognized as best practices for practitioners and courts dealing with forensic evidence. Attorneys or others who wish to comment on these recommendations …
Draft Policy Recommendations by the National Commission on Forensic ScienceRead More