North Carolina Office of Indigent Defense Services
// by terrisims
The National Institute of Justice has published several reports on novel techniques that are being investigated in order to improve forensic analysis. Take a look at the reports below to learn about some of the latest techniques that are being developed and to get a forecast of what techniques you may see coming soon to …
NIJ Has Made Available New Forensic Technical ReportsRead More
// by terrisims
A new reference standard for comparing cartridge casings has been developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The standard is known as SRM 2461, Standard Casing. It was developed to assist firearms examiners by ensuring that the equipment used to match cartridge cases to those in the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network …
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Sarah Olson
The Impression & Pattern Evidence Symposium is taking place today through Thursday, August 9, 2012. The live program, sponsored by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Office of Justice Programs and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Laboratory Division, is being streamed online here. The agenda is available here. Topics include the latest developments and …
Impression & Pattern Evidence Symposium – Online today!Read More
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Sarah Olson
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is presenting a two-day conference which will address the techniques used in firearm and toolmark comparisons, the standards for this discipline, and efforts to apply more objective and quantitative measurment based techniques to this type of analysis. This conference is being broadcast live online on July 10-11, …
Measurement Science and Standards in Forensic Firearms Analysis Webcast – TODAYRead More
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Sarah Olson
Article by Clifford Spiegelman and William A. Tobin that evaluates experiments used to justify conclusions of “individualization” or specific source attribution to “100% certainty” and “near-zero” rates of error claimed by firearm toolmark examiners in court testimonies and suggests approaches for establishing statistical foundations for this firearm and toolmark comparisons.
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers