• About
  • Blog
  • Forensic Disciplines
    • Foundations of Forensics
    • Arson
    • Bite Mark
    • Blood & Bodily Fluids
    • Child Abuse Allegations
    • Crime Scene Investigation
    • Death by Distribution
    • Death Investigation
    • Detection Dogs
    • Digital Evidence
    • DNA
    • Drug Analysis
    • Drug Recognition Experts
    • Eyewitness ID
    • Fingerprints
    • Firearms
    • Forensic/Sexual Assault Exams
    • Measurement Uncertainty
    • Mental Health
    • Toxicology
    • Trace Evidence
  • Resources
    • Forensic Consultations
    • Books
    • Cases
    • Featured Articles
    • Legislation
    • Motions and Briefs
      • Discovery Motions
      • Funding for Experts
      • Motions for Appropriate Relief
      • Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony
      • Motions for Independent Testing
      • Motions to Preserve Evidence
      • Motions to Suppress
      • Analyst Certification Motions
    • Reports & Publications
    • Trainings
    • Websites
    • Forensic Terminology
    • Online Research Tools
  • Crime Labs
    • General Information
    • NC State Crime Lab Procedures
    • Charlotte Mecklenburg Crime Lab
    • CCBI Lab Procedures
    • NC OCME Toxicology Lab
    • Pitt Co. Sheriff’s Forensic Services
    • Sec. of State Digital Forensic Lab
    • Wilmington Police Dept Crime Lab
    • Private and Out-of-State Labs
  • News Articles
  • Experts
    • Browse All Experts
    • Working with Experts
    • Expert Services Project
    • Add or Update Expert Records
    • Find a Private Investigator
  • Subscribe
  • Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Forensic Resources

North Carolina Office of Indigent Defense Services

Header Right

MENUMENU
  • About
  • Blog
  • Forensic Disciplines
        • Foundations of Forensics
        • Arson
        • Bite Mark
        • Blood & Bodily Fluids
        • Child Abuse Allegations
        • Crime Scene Investigation
        • Death by Distribution
        • Death Investigation
        • Detection Dogs
        • Digital Evidence
        • DNA
        • Drug Analysis
        • Drug Recognition Experts
        • Eyewitness ID
        • Fingerprints
        • Firearms
        • Forensic/Sexual Assault Exams
        • Measurement Uncertainty
        • Mental Health
        • Toxicology
        • Trace Evidence
  • Resources
        • Forensic Consultations
        • Books
        • Cases
        • Featured Articles
        • Legislation
        • Reports & Publications
        • Trainings
        • Websites
        • Forensic Terminology
        • Online Research Tools
        • Motions and Briefs
          • Discovery Motions
          • Funding for Experts
          • Motions for Appropriate Relief
          • Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony
          • Motions for Independent Testing
          • Motions to Preserve Evidence
          • Motions to Suppress
          • Analyst Certification Motions
  • Crime Labs
    • General Information
    • NC State Crime Lab Procedures
    • Charlotte Mecklenburg Crime Lab
    • CCBI Lab Procedures
    • NC OCME Toxicology Lab
    • Pitt Co. Sheriff’s Forensic Services
    • Sec. of State Digital Forensic Lab
    • Wilmington Police Dept Crime Lab
    • Private and Out-of-State Labs
  • News Articles
  • Experts
    • Browse All Experts
    • Working with Experts
    • Expert Services Project
    • Add or Update Expert Records
    • Find a Private Investigator
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Archives for Digital Evidence

Digital Evidence

Do Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment?

February 24, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

Do Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment?Read More

Article Source: LawfareForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

The police want your phone data. Here’s what they can get — and what they can’t.

February 24, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

The police want your phone data. Here’s what they can get — and what they can’t.Read More

Article Source: VOXForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Forensic science failures putting justice at risk, says regulator

February 24, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

Forensic science failures putting justice at risk, says regulatorRead More

Article Source: The GuardianForensic Discipline: Crime Labs, Digital Evidence, Foundations of Forensics

911 operators couldn’t trace the location of a dying student’s phone. It’s a growing issue.

February 22, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

911 operators couldn’t trace the location of a dying student’s phone. It’s a growing issue.Read More

Article Source: Washington PostForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Kentucky Appeals Court Says Cops Need Warrants To Obtain Real-Time Cell Site Location Info

February 21, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

Kentucky Appeals Court Says Cops Need Warrants To Obtain Real-Time Cell Site Location InfoRead More

Article Source: TechdirtForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

California Cops Are Collecting Info on Millions of Drivers Who Have Done Nothing Wrong

February 21, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

California Cops Are Collecting Info on Millions of Drivers Who Have Done Nothing WrongRead More

Article Source: Mother JonesForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Alexa records you more often than you think

February 21, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

Alexa records you more often than you thinkRead More

Article Source: VOXForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Racial Profiling 2.0

February 20, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

Racial Profiling 2.0Read More

Article Source: CBSNewsForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

N.Y.P.D. to Remove DNA Profiles of Non-Criminals From Database

February 20, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

N.Y.P.D. to Remove DNA Profiles of Non-Criminals From DatabaseRead More

Article Source: New York TimesForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Can algorithms help judges make fair decisions?

February 20, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

Can algorithms help judges make fair decisions?Read More

Article Source: WHYYForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Axon rolls out the next level of police technology: Live-streaming body cameras

February 19, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

Axon rolls out the next level of police technology: Live-streaming body camerasRead More

Article Source: Washington PostForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

State v. Mitchell, 840 S.E.2d 276 (2020)

February 18, 2020 //  by Sarah Ammons

Rule 701 allows a non-expert to testify in the form of opinion or inference where it is rationally based on a perception of the witness and helpful to the determination of a fact in issue. Testimony from a lay witness and an officer about their suspicion that the defendant used an app to conceal text …

State v. Mitchell, 840 S.E.2d 276 (2020)Read More

Resource Category: CasesForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Raleigh police abruptly end use of controversial facial recognition tech

February 12, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

Raleigh police abruptly end use of controversial facial recognition techRead More

Article Source: WRALForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

The world’s scariest facial recognition software, explained

February 11, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

The world’s scariest facial recognition software, explainedRead More

Article Source: VOXForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Why we don’t know as much as we should about police surveillance technology

February 5, 2020 //  by Sarah Olson

Why we don’t know as much as we should about police surveillance technologyRead More

Article Source: VOXForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 43
  • Go to Next Page »

Site Footer

The Forensic Resource Counsel provides assistance to North Carolina attorneys litigating scientific evidence issues.
Information provided on this website is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.
Copyright © 2026 · Office of Indigent Defense Services · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design

Copyright © 2026 Forensic Resources · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme