• About
  • Blog
  • Forensic Disciplines
    • Foundations of Forensics
    • Arson
    • Bite Mark
    • Blood & Bodily Fluids
    • Child Abuse Allegations
    • Crime Scene Investigation
    • Death by Distribution
    • Death Investigation
    • Detection Dogs
    • Digital Evidence
    • DNA
    • Drug Analysis
    • Drug Recognition Experts
    • Eyewitness ID
    • Fingerprints
    • Firearms
    • Forensic/Sexual Assault Exams
    • Measurement Uncertainty
    • Mental Health
    • Toxicology
    • Trace Evidence
  • Resources
    • Forensic Consultations
    • Books
    • Cases
    • Featured Articles
    • Legislation
    • Motions and Briefs
      • Discovery Motions
      • Funding for Experts
      • Motions for Appropriate Relief
      • Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony
      • Motions for Independent Testing
      • Motions to Preserve Evidence
      • Motions to Suppress
      • Analyst Certification Motions
    • Reports & Publications
    • Trainings
    • Websites
    • Forensic Terminology
    • Online Research Tools
  • Crime Labs
    • General Information
    • NC State Crime Lab Procedures
    • Charlotte Mecklenburg Crime Lab
    • CCBI Lab Procedures
    • NC OCME Toxicology Lab
    • Pitt Co. Sheriff’s Forensic Services
    • Sec. of State Digital Forensic Lab
    • Wilmington Police Dept Crime Lab
    • Private and Out-of-State Labs
  • News Articles
  • Experts
    • Browse All Experts
    • Working with Experts
    • Expert Services Project
    • Add or Update Expert Records
    • Find a Private Investigator
  • Subscribe
  • Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Forensic Resources

North Carolina Office of Indigent Defense Services

Header Right

MENUMENU
  • About
  • Blog
  • Forensic Disciplines
        • Foundations of Forensics
        • Arson
        • Bite Mark
        • Blood & Bodily Fluids
        • Child Abuse Allegations
        • Crime Scene Investigation
        • Death by Distribution
        • Death Investigation
        • Detection Dogs
        • Digital Evidence
        • DNA
        • Drug Analysis
        • Drug Recognition Experts
        • Eyewitness ID
        • Fingerprints
        • Firearms
        • Forensic/Sexual Assault Exams
        • Measurement Uncertainty
        • Mental Health
        • Toxicology
        • Trace Evidence
  • Resources
        • Forensic Consultations
        • Books
        • Cases
        • Featured Articles
        • Legislation
        • Reports & Publications
        • Trainings
        • Websites
        • Forensic Terminology
        • Online Research Tools
        • Motions and Briefs
          • Discovery Motions
          • Funding for Experts
          • Motions for Appropriate Relief
          • Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony
          • Motions for Independent Testing
          • Motions to Preserve Evidence
          • Motions to Suppress
          • Analyst Certification Motions
  • Crime Labs
    • General Information
    • NC State Crime Lab Procedures
    • Charlotte Mecklenburg Crime Lab
    • CCBI Lab Procedures
    • NC OCME Toxicology Lab
    • Pitt Co. Sheriff’s Forensic Services
    • Sec. of State Digital Forensic Lab
    • Wilmington Police Dept Crime Lab
    • Private and Out-of-State Labs
  • News Articles
  • Experts
    • Browse All Experts
    • Working with Experts
    • Expert Services Project
    • Add or Update Expert Records
    • Find a Private Investigator
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Archives for Digital Evidence

Digital Evidence

Warrants Can Force Google To Look Through Your Search History–A Tragic Arson Case May Decide If That’s Constitutional

June 30, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

Warrants Can Force Google To Look Through Your Search History–A Tragic Arson Case May Decide If That’s ConstitutionalRead More

Article Source: ForbesForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

What to do with low-quality video evidence

June 24, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

Last week an article in The Assembly, The Shooter in the Video, came across my virtual desk. The article focused on the case of James Richardson, who was convicted of murder in Pitt County in 2011, and the work of his family, supporters and his post-conviction attorney Heather Rattelade to overturn his conviction. A key …

What to do with low-quality video evidenceRead More

Category: Practice TipsForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

The Shooter in the Video

June 16, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

The Shooter in the VideoRead More

Article Source: The AssemblyForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Sweeping Legislation Aims to Ban the Sale of Location Data

June 15, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

Sweeping Legislation Aims to Ban the Sale of Location DataRead More

Article Source: ViceForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Geofence Warrant Primer

June 6, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

5-page primer from NACDL’s Fourth Amendment Center that prepares attorneys to litigate a motion to suppress a geofence warrant.

Geofence Warrant PrimerRead More

Resource Category: Reports and PublicationsResource Source: NACDLForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Expert assistance from Envista Forensics now available through Expert Services Project

June 1, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

We want court appointed attorneys to use experts, and we want using experts to be easier for attorneys. Access to qualified expert services is essential to the provision of indigent defense. To better equip the North Carolina public defense community with the resources it needs to achieve fair and just outcomes for clients, Indigent Defense …

Expert assistance from Envista Forensics now available through Expert Services ProjectRead More

Category: ExpertsForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

A Face Search Engine Anyone Can Use Is Alarmingly Accurate

May 31, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

A Face Search Engine Anyone Can Use Is Alarmingly AccurateRead More

Article Source: New York TimesForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Clearview AI settles suit and agrees to limit sales of facial recognition database

May 27, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

Clearview AI settles suit and agrees to limit sales of facial recognition databaseRead More

Article Source: New York TimesForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

US surveillance of Americans must stop

May 14, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

US surveillance of Americans must stopRead More

Article Source: The HillForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

An algorithm that screens for child neglect raises concerns

April 30, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

An algorithm that screens for child neglect raises concernsRead More

Forensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Google Location Data Tempts Police While Privacy Advocates Worry

April 11, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

Google Location Data Tempts Police While Privacy Advocates WorryRead More

Article Source: Bloomberg LawForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Too much Big Brother? Mobile gunshot detection initiative stirs government surveillance concerns

March 23, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

Too much Big Brother? Mobile gunshot detection initiative stirs government surveillance concernsRead More

Article Source: AL.comForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Cellphone dragnets can help catch criminals. Judges say they can also violate constitutional rights.

March 21, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

Cellphone dragnets can help catch criminals. Judges say they can also violate constitutional rights.Read More

Article Source: Washington PostForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

Results from a Black-Box Study for Digital Forensic Examiners

March 15, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

In Feb. 2022, NIST published the results of a study that looked at outcomes of mock mobile and hard-drive examinations by digital forensic examiners. 394 individuals registered for the mobile test, and 77 participants completed the mobile case study. 450 individuals registered for the hard-drive test and 102 participants completed the hard drive case study. …

Results from a Black-Box Study for Digital Forensic ExaminersRead More

Category: Featured ArticlesForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

The Fourth Amendment and Geofence Warrants: A Critical Look at United States v. Chatrie

March 11, 2022 //  by Sarah Olson

The Fourth Amendment and Geofence Warrants: A Critical Look at United States v. ChatrieRead More

Article Source: The Volokh ConspiracyForensic Discipline: Digital Evidence

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 43
  • Go to Next Page »

Site Footer

The Forensic Resource Counsel provides assistance to North Carolina attorneys litigating scientific evidence issues.
Information provided on this website is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.
Copyright © 2026 · Office of Indigent Defense Services · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design

Copyright © 2026 Forensic Resources · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme