Nov. 2016 Journal of Law and Biosciences article.
Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claimsRead More
// by Sarah Olson
Nov. 2016 Journal of Law and Biosciences article.
Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claimsRead More
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Sarah Olson
The 2016 President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Report concluded that “bitemark analysis does not meet scientific standards for foundational validity, and is far from meeting such standards. To the contrary, available scientific evidence strongly suggests that examiners cannot consistently agree on whether an injury is a human bitemark and cannot identify the …
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers
// by Chris Liu-Beers