Friday, February 5 (9 am to 12 pm)
Thursday, February 11 (2 pm to 5 pm)
Friday, February 12 (9 am to 12 pm)
Forensic evidence, from DNA to fingerprints to ballistics, has never been more important in criminal cases. Actually litigating scientific evidence in the courtroom can be challenging and requires some specialized skills.
Duke Law is excited to offer a short course, with NC CLE credit pending approval, at the Duke University School of Law, in Durham, North Carolina.
The course is free and open to a small number of practicing criminal lawyers. Both prosecutors and defense attorneys are encouraged to attend. The course will be open to fifteen Duke Law students. The course will be most valuable for lawyers with some criminal experience, but without much experience litigating forensic science issues.
The course will be a practicum: a scientific evidence trial advocacy course centered around a simulated case involving a fingerprint match. Lessons on fingerprint analysis, testimony, and research–which will provide you the substantive foundation to tackle the direct and cross of a fingerprint expert–will be pre-recorded and made available in advance of the first class. On the morning of Friday, Feb. 5, participants will briefly review and field questions related to the material covered in these videos, walk through the mock case file, and both sides (prosecution and defense) will interview the fingerprint expert. Each participant will be given the role of either prosecutor or defense attorney, and all will meet to prepare together for Thursday Feb. 11 and Friday Feb. 12 – sessions fully focused on simulated forensic litigation. Participants will be provided with readings and materials in advance of the course, including a “trial file” containing documents obtained through discovery in this mock case (e.g. forensic reports, laboratory files, and expert CVs), trial exhibits and background materials to assist in preparing for trial (e.g. hearing and trial transcripts, excerpts of reports issued by the National Academy of Sciences and the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology). During the simulations, participants will interview the fingerprint expert who authored the mock report, qualify the expert, conduct direct and cross-examination of the fingerprint expert, and present short closings. Between sessions, feedback will be provided about what worked and what did not.
To apply take the course, since enrollment is limited to a small number of participants, please email the instructors at bgarrett@law.duke.edu and katephilpott@gmail.com. Please include a CV and note any background interest and experience in litigating forensics issues.
About the Instructors
Brandon L. Garrett joined the Duke Law faculty in 2018 as the inaugural L. Neil Williams, Jr. Professor of Law. Garrett is the Director of the Wilson Center for Science and Justice at Duke Law, and he is part of the Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence (CSAFE). His research on our criminal justice system has ranged from the lessons to be learned from cases where innocent people were exonerated by DNA tests, to research on false confessions, forensics, and eyewitness memory, to the difficult compromises that prosecutors reach when targeting the largest corporations. He teaches scientific evidence and forensic evidence courses; his new book on how to improve forensics, “Autopsy of a Crime Lab,” will be published by California U. Press in March 2020. His other books include “Convicting the Innocent,” published in 2011, “Too Big to Jail,” published in 2014, “Habeas Corpus: Executive Detention and Post-Conviction Litigation,” published in 2014, and “End of its Rope,” published in 2017.
Kate Philpott is a scientific and legal consultant specializing in strategic litigation related to the forensic sciences. In that role she advises individuals and organizations with respect to case-specific and systemic forensic issues and trains attorneys, investigators and forensic analysts regarding the same. Previously, she was the forensic staff attorney for the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia, and before that, a litigation associate at Covington & Burling. Philpott is also engaged in forensic reform efforts, including serving on the Legal Task Group of the Organization of Scientific Area Committees, the American Academy of Forensic Science Standard Board’s Firearms and Toolmarks Consensus Body, the Human Factors Subcommittee of the National Commission on Forensic Science and the Forensic Disciplines Committee of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.